Single judge held the present constitutional application was infructuous due to the death of respondent No. 2 and dismissed it accordingly.
Disposal of the application
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:122653
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
231
CRM-A-97-MA-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.09.2023
GURPREET SINGH GHAG
... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present: Ms. Komal Balain, Advocate for Mr. AS Mann, Advocate for the applicant.
�������������������������������������������
HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.(Oral)
As per the Office report, respondent No.2, namely, Gopal Duggal son of Mohan Lal Duggal, has since expired on 27.10.2019. Along with the report, death certificate dated 07.11.2019 is also attached.
In view of the above, the present application has become
infructuous.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
| 19.09.2023 | (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) | |
|---|---|---|
| Aman Jain | JUDGE | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
|
| Whether reportable | : Yes/No |
AMAN JAIN 2023.09.19 15:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gurpreet Singh Ghag
State of Punjab
Harnaresh Singh Gill
Aman Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
