The Court dismissed the petition quashing the FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C as trial had commenced and investigation completed, denying interference at this stage.
Petition for quashing dismissed; petitioner allowed to take defence in trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
247
2023:PHHC:124132
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-7855-2019 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 20.09.2023
Balwinder Kaur …Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others …Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Mohit Thakur, AAG, Punjab.
ARUN MONGA,J. (ORAL)
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking quashing of Calendra No.40 dated 24.01.2018 registered under Section 182 IPC at Police Station Division No.1 Commissionerate, Jalandhar along with subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.
trial Court.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2023 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2023.09.25 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/ judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Section 482 Cr.P.C offers any ground for quashing the FIR since trial commenced and investigation is complete.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Balwinder Kaur
State of Punjab
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
