Allowed

Rishabh v. Ut Chandigarh and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC11 Sept 2023CRM-M/6410/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed a petition seeking quashing of an FIR registered under IPC Sections 323, 342, and 506. Relying on a Magistrate's report of a voluntary compromise, the Court exercised its power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.0131 dated 27.07.2022 registered under Sections 323, 342 and 506 of IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom qua the petitioner are quashed.

Rishabh Vs Ut Chandigarh and Another — Quashing and FIR | Punjab & Haryana HC (2023)

¶1

CRM-M-6410-2023 (O&M) 2023:PHHC:119294

¶2

265

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-6410-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.09.2023

Rishabh

…Petitioner

UT Chandigarh and another

¶9

…Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

¶11

Present: - Mr. Akshay Mittal, Advocate, For the petitioner.

¶12

Mr. Anupam Bansal, Addl. PP, U.T. Chandigarh

¶13

Mr. Jashan Sekhon, Advocate, for the complainant.

¶14

*********

¶15

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)

¶16

Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.0131 dated 27.07.2022 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 323, 342 and 506 of IPC, at Police Station, Industrial Area, District Chandigarh on the basis of compromise dated 27.01.2023 (Annexure P-2), stated to have been arrived between the parties.

¶17

Since quashing was sought on the basis of compromise, this Court on 07.02.2023 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court/Area Magistrate for recording their statements in support of the compromise. A veracity report was also called for.

¶18

Report dated 22.08.2023 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh had been received. Report reveals that statements of complainant party i.e. respondent No.2 as also of accused/present petitioner herein, were duly recorded. It is opined that a compromise has been arrived at without any pressure, undue influence or coercion. The report is accompanied by the statements of parties. It is apparent that the complainant/respondent No.2 and accused/petitioner have arrived at a compromise voluntarily and without any coercion.

¶19

DINESH 2023.09.16 12:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶20

Page 1 of 2

¶21

CRM-M-6410-2023 (O&M) 2023:PHHC:119294

¶22

Learned counsel for complainant/respondent No.2 states that he would have no objection to the quashing of FIR in question.

¶23

This Court in appropriate cases can exercise the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal proceedings/FIR on the basis of compromise. A reference in this regard may be made to a decision dated29.09.2021 of the Supreme Court in case titled “ Ramgopal and anr. V. The State of Madhya Pradesh”¹ and a Full Bench decision of this Court in “ Kulwinder Singh and others V. State of Punjab and others”² .

¶24

In the premise it is an appropriate case for exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and to bring to an end the criminal proceedings initiated in the light of impugned FIR.

¶25

Petition is thus allowed. FIR No.0131 dated 27.07.2022 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 323, 342 and 506 of IPC, at Police Station, Industrial Area, District Chandigarh on the basis of compromise dated 27.01.2023 (Annexure P-2) and all proceedings emanating there from qua the petitioner stand quashed.

¶26

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

¶27

(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE

¶28

11.09.2023 dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶29

2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052

¶30

1Criminal Appeal No.1489 of 2012

¶31

DINESH 2023.09.16 12:58 2 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶32

Page 2 of 2

Rishabh v. Ut Chandigarh and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rishabh v. Ut Chandigarh and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Vs Laxman

Harminder Singh Vs State of Punjab

Soeb @ Mohammad Soeb Vs State of Haryana

Ravi Kumar Vs State of Punjab

Balraj Singh @ Boori Vs State of Punjab

Leela Budda Vs State of Punjab