Allowed

Vinod Patwari v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC7 Dec 2023CRM-M/58614/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to a Halka Patwari accused of demanding a bribe of Rs. 10,000 under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The respondent's counsel secured bail subject to stringent conditions, including surrendering all prepaid SIM cards except one linked to the Aadhaar card, and appearing in court as directed, emphasizing that further pre-trial incarceration was unju

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by personal bond or fixed deposit/blocked funds, subject to stringent conditions including restriction to one prepaid SIM, surrender of all other phones, and undertaking no

Vinod Patwari Vs State of Haryana — Corruption | Punjab & Haryana HC (2023)

¶1

CRM-M-58614-2023

¶2

255 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CRM-M-58614-2023

¶4

Reserved on: 29.11.2023 Pronounced on: 07.12.2023

Vinod Patwari

...Pe!!oner

Versus

State of Haryana …Respondent

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

¶10

Present: Ms. Pooja Jaglan, Advocate for the pe!!oner.

¶11

Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

¶12

****

¶13

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

¶14

FIR No.	Dated	Police Sta!on	Sec!ons
19	05.09.2023	An! Corrup!on	7, (13(1) (b) read with 13 (2)
		Bureau, Karnal	of PC Act, 1988 added later on)

¶15

The pe!!oner incarcerated in the FIR cap!oned above has come up before this Court under Sec!on 439 CrPC seeking bail.

¶16

In paragraph 14 of the bail pe!!on, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.

¶17

Pe!!oner's counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent condi!ons and is also voluntarily agreeable to the condi!on that !ll the conclusion of the trial before the trial court, the pe!!oner shall keep only one mobile number, which is men!oned in AADHAR card, and within fiCeen days of release from prison undertakes to disconnect all other mobile numbers. The pe!!oner contends that the further pre-trial incarcera!on would cause an irreversible injus!ce to the pe!!oner and family.

¶18

The State opposes bail.

¶19

Facts of the case are being extracted from status report by way of affidavit of concerned DySP dated 28.11.2023 which reads as under:-

¶20

“2. That the pe��oner has concealed the true and material facts from this Hon'ble High Court. The true facts of the case are

¶21

Jyoti Sharma 2023.12.07 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Sector 1, High Court, Chandigarh

¶22

¶23

CRM-M-58614-2023

¶24

that on 05-09-2023, Sandeep (complainant) handed over his complaint to Inspector Saroj Bala (inves�ga�ng officer) wherein he had stated that on 9-6-2020, he (complainant) had purchased about 3 bighas of land in village Pa- Kalyana, Tehsil Samalkha, District Panipat in the name of his mother Prakasho Devi but �ll date muta�on has not been done. When complainant met Halka Patwari Vinod (pe��oner-accused) regarding muta�on of his land on 21-8-2023, he (pe��oner-accused) demanded bribe money of Rs. 10,000/-in lieu of sanc�oning/entering the muta�on of his mother Prakasho Devi land situated in Village Pa- Kalyana, Teshil Samalkha, Panipat but complainant did not want to pay the bribe money to pe��oner-accused.

¶25

Upon which the present FIR No. 19 dated 05-09-2023 (Annexure P-1) was registered against Vinod Patwari (pe��oneraccused) u/s 7 Preven�on of Corrup�on Act, 1988 (sec�on 13(1) (b), 13 (2) Preven�on of Corrup�on Act, 1988 added subsequently) in the Police Sta�on, An� Corrup�on Bureau, Karnal Range, Karnal.

¶26

3. That during the course of inves�ga�on, the Superintendent of Police, An� Corrup�on Bureau, Karnal appointed Sh. Parveen Kumar, ETO, (Sale Tax) as Independent Witness/GazeCed Officer, upon which the GazeCed Officer further appointed Vinay Kumar, Inspector Excise and Taxa�on Office, District Panipat of his office as Shadow Witness. Raiding team was cons�tuted and aDer applying Phenolphthalein powder on currency notes of Rs. 10,000/-, the said notes were handed over to the complainant Sandeep, who was instructed to hand over Rs. 10,000 to Vinod Patwari, Halka Pa- Kalyana Tehsil Samalkha, District Panipat on raising his demand for the same. The shadow witness was also instructed to see and hear the conversa�on between the complainant and the accused and was further directed to give the appointed signal to the raiding team. List of currency notes, memo of handing over the notes and the search memo of complainant was prepared.

¶27

The complainant and the shadow witness proceeded to meet Vinod Patwari. The complainant and the shadow witness acted accordingly and thereaDer Vinod Patwari (pe��oneraccused) was apprehended on the spot in Tehsil Samalkha, District Panipat. Upon asking him to produce the bribe money, Vinod Patwari (pe��oner-accused), got recovered the tainted money of Rs. 10,000/-from the leD back side pocket of his pant. The serials numbers of currency notes were matched and they were found same. The hands of the complainant and accused were got washed separately and the solu�on thereof turned light pink. The recovered currency notes, pant and nips of hand washes were converted into separate sealed parcels and were taken into possession vide separate recovery memos which were also signed

¶28

Jyoti Sharma 2023.12.07 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Sector 1, High Court, Chandigarh

¶29

¶30

CRM-M-58614-2023

¶31

by the respec�ve witnesses. ThereaDer, pe��oner-accused was arrested in the present case. The statements of the witnesses were got recorded u/s 161 Cr.P.C.

¶32

4. That on 6-9-2023, complainant Sandeep produced the Pen drive before the inves�ga�ng officer, wherein demand of bribe/conversa�on was recorded between Sandeep (complainant) and Vinod Patwari (pe��oner-accused), upon which the inves�ga�ng officer with the help of ASI Surender prepared the three Audio DVD's and its transcript in Hindi respec�vely and aDer conver�ng the DVD's into a sealed parcel, the DVD's, its transcript and Cer�ficate u/s 65-B, Evidence Act were taken into possession vide memo which was signed by respec�ve witnesses. The inves�ga�ng officer also recorded the statement of witnesses u/s 161 Cr.P.C on even dates. The true typed copy of the transcript is aCached herewith as Annexure R-1).

¶33

During the course of inves�ga�on, the inves�ga�ng officer produced complainant Sandeep before the Ld. JMIC, Panipat and got recorded his statements u/s 164 Cr.p.c, who also corroborated the prosecu�on version and specifically stated that Vinod Patwari (pe��oner-accused) had demanded the bribe money from him.”

¶34

Given the penal provisions invoked viz-a-viz pre-trial custody, coupled with the primafacie analysis of the nature of allega!ons, and the other factors peculiar to this case, there would be no jus!fiability further pre-trial incarcera!on at this stage, subject to the compliance of terms and condi!ons men!oned in this order. As per custody cer!ficate dated 28.11.2023, the pe!!oner had undergone 2 months and 23 days of actual sentence. Given the amount involved of Rs.10,000/- vis-a-vis the custody, it is not a case for further pre-trial incarcera!on.

¶35

In Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Inves!ga!on, (2012) 1 SCC 40, Supreme Court holds,

¶36

[28] We are conscious of the fact that the accused are charged with economic offences of huge magnitude. We are also conscious of the fact that the offences alleged, if proved, may jeopardize the economy of the country. At the same !me, we cannot lose sight of the fact that the inves!ga!ng agency has already completed inves!ga!on and the charge sheet is already filed before the Special Judge, CBI, New Delhi. Therefore, their presence in the custody may not be necessary for further inves!ga!on. We are of the view that the appellants are en!tled to the grant of bail pending trial on stringent condi!ons in order to ally the apprehension expressed by CBI.

¶37

The possibility of the accused influencing the inves!ga!on, tampering with evidence, in!mida!ng witnesses, and the likelihood of fleeing jus!ce, can be taken care

¶38

Jyoti Sharma 2023.12.07 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Sector 1, High Court, Chandigarh

¶39

¶40

CRM-M-58614-2023

¶41

of by imposing elabora!ve and stringent condi!ons. In Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2020:INSC:106 [Para 92] , (2020) 5 SCC 1, Para 92, the Cons!tu!onal Bench held that unusually, subject to the evidence produced, the Courts can impose restric!ve condi!ons.

¶42

9. Without commen!ng on the case's merits, in the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, and for the reasons men!oned above, the pe!!oner makes a case for bail, subject to the following terms and condi!ons, which shall be over and above and irrespec!ve of the contents of the form of bail bonds in chapter XXXIII of CrPC, 1973.

¶43

In Madhu Tanwar v. State of Punjab, 2023:PHHC:077618 [Para 10, 21] , CRM-M27097-2023, decided on 29-05-2023, this court observed,

¶44

[10] The exponen!al growth in technology and ar!ficial intelligence has transformed iden!fica!on techniques remarkably. Voice, gait, and facial recogni!on are incredibly sophis!cated and pervasive. Impersona!on, as we know it tradi!onally, has virtually become impossible. Thus, the remedy lies that whenever a judge or an officer believes that the accused might be a flight risk or has a history of fleeing from jus!ce, then in such cases, appropriate condi!ons can be inserted that all the expenditure that shall be incurred to trace them, shall be recovered from such person, and the State shall have a lien over their assets to make good the loss.

¶45

[21] In this era when the knowledge revolu!on has just begun, to keep pace with exponen!al and unimaginable changes the technology has brought to human lives, it is only fiOng that the dependence of the accused on surety is minimized by giving alterna!ve op!ons. Furthermore, there should be no insistence to provide permanent addresses when people either do not have permanent abodes or intend to re-locate.

¶46

Given above, provided the pe!!oner is not required in any other case, the pe!!oner shall be released on bail in the FIR cap!oned above, in the following terms :

¶47

(a). Pe!!oner to furnish personal bond of Rs. Ten thousand (INR 10,000/); AND

¶48

(b) To give one surety of Rs. Twenty-five thousand (INR 25,000/-), to the sa!sfac!on of the concerned court, and in case of non-availability, to any nearest Ilaqa Magistrate/duty Magistrate. Before accep!ng the surety, the concerned officer/court must sa!sfy that if the accused fails to appear in court, then such surety can produce the accused before the court.

¶49

¶50

Jyoti Sharma 2023.12.07 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Sector 1, High Court, Chandigarh

¶51

¶52

CRM-M-58614-2023

¶53

(b). Pe!!oner to hand over to the concerned court a fixed deposit for Rs. Ten thousand only (INR 10,000/-), with the clause of automa!c renewal of the principal and the interest rever!ng to the linked account, made in favor of the ‘Chief Judicial Magistrate’ of the concerned district, or blocking the aforesaid amount in favour of the concerned ‘Chief Judicial Magistrate’. Said fixed deposit or blocking funds can be from any of the banks where the stake of the State is more than 50% or from any of the well-established and stable private sector banks. In case the bankers are not willing to make a Fixed Deposit in such eventuality it shall be permissible for the pe!!oner to prepare an account payee demand draC favouring concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate for the similar amount. (c). Such court shall have a lien over the funds un!l the case's closure or discharged by subs!tu!on, or up to the expiry of the period men!oned under S. 437-A CrPC, 1973, and at that stage, subject to the proceedings under S. 446 CrPC, the en!re amount of fixed deposit, less taxes if any, shall be endorsed/returned to the depositor.

¶54

(d). The pe!!oner is to also execute a bond for aTendance in the concerned court(s) as and when asked to do so. The presenta!on of the personal bond shall be deemed acceptance of the declara!ons made in the bail pe!!on and all other s!pula!ons, terms, and condi!ons of sec!on 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and of this bail order.

¶55

(e). While furnishing personal bond, the pe!!oner shall men!on the following personal iden!fica!on details:

¶56

AADHAR number 2. Passport number, (If available), when the court aTes!ng the bonds, thinks appropriate or considers the accused as a flight risk.

¶57

Mobile number (If available) 4. E-Mail id (If available)

¶58

The pe!!oner shall not influence, browbeat, pressurize, make any inducement, threat, or promise, directly or indirectly, to the witnesses, the Police officials, or any other person acquainted with the facts and the circumstances of the case, to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Police, or the Court, or to tamper with the evidence.

¶59

Jyoti Sharma 2023.12.07 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Sector 1, High Court, Chandigarh

¶60

¶61

CRM-M-58614-2023

¶62

Pe!!oner to comply with their undertaking made in the bail pe!!on, made before this court through counsel as reflected at the beginning of this order. If the pe!!oner fails to comply with any of such undertakings, then on this ground alone, the bail might be canceled, and the vic!m/complainant may file any such applica!on for the cancella!on of bail, and the State shall file the said applica!on.

¶63

The pe!!oner is directed not to keep more than one prepaid SIM, i.e., one prepaid mobile phone number, !ll the conclusion of the trial; however, this restric!on is only on prepaid SIMs [mobile numbers] and not on post-paid connec!ons or landline numbers. The pe!!oner must comply with this condi!on within fiCeen days of release from prison. The concerned DySP shall also direct all the telecom service providers to deac!vate all prepaid SIM cards and prepaid mobile numbers issued to the pe!!oner, except the one that is men!oned as the primary number/ default number linked with the AADHAAR card and further that !ll the no objec!on from the concerned SHO, the mobile service providers shall not issue second pre-paid SIM/ mobile number in the pe!!oner’s name. Since, as on date, in India, there are only four prominent mobile service providers, namely BSNL, Airtel, Vodafone-Idea, and Reliance Jio, any other telecom service provider are directed to comply with the direc!ons of the concerned Superintendent of Police/Commissioner of Police, issued in this regard and disable all prepaid mobile phone numbers issued in the name of the pe!!oner, except the main number/default number linked with AADHAR, by taking such informa!on from the pe!!oner’s AADHAR details or any other source, for which they shall be legally en!tled by this order. This condi!on shall con!nue !ll the comple!on of the trial or closure of the case, whichever is earlier. In Vernon v. The State of Maharashtra, 2023 INSC 655 , [para 45], while gran!ng bail under Unlawful Ac!vi!es (Preven!on) Act, 2002, Supreme Court had directed imposi!on of the similar condi!on, which reads as follows, “(d) Both the appellants shall use only one Mobile Phone each, during the !me they remain on bail and shall inform the Inves!ga!ng Officer of the NIA, their respec!ve mobile numbers.”

¶64

During the trial's pendency, if the pe!!oner repeats or commits any offence where the sentence prescribed is more than seven years or violates any condi!on as s!pulated in this order, it shall always be permissible to the respondent to apply for cancella!on of this bail. It shall further be open for any inves!ga!ng agency to bring it to the no!ce of the Court seized of the subsequent applica!on that the accused was earlier cau!oned not to indulge in criminal ac!vi!es. Otherwise, the bail bonds shall remain in force throughout the trial and aCer that in Sec!on 437-A of the Cr.P.C., if not canceled due to non-appearance or breach of condi!ons.

¶65

Jyoti Sharma 2023.12.07 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Sector 1, High Court, Chandigarh

¶66

¶67

CRM-M-58614-2023

¶68

The condi!ons men!oned above imposed by this Court are to endeavour that the accused tries to reform, does not repeat the offence and to provide a sense of security to the vic!m. In Mohammed Zubair v. State of NCT of Delhi , 2022:INSC:735 [Para 28] , Writ Pe!!on (Criminal) No 279 of 2022, Para 29, decided on July 20, 2022, A ThreeJudge bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court holds that “The bail condi!ons imposed by the Court must not only have a nexus to the purpose that they seek to serve but must also be propor!onal to the purpose of imposing them. The courts while imposing bail condi!ons must balance the liberty of the accused and the necessity of a fair trial. While doing so, condi!ons that would result in the depriva!on of rights and liber!es must be eschewed.”

¶69

Any Advocate for the pe!!oner and the Officer in whose presence the pe!!oner puts signatures on personal bonds shall explain all condi!ons of this bail order in any language that the pe!!oner understands.

¶70

If the pe!!oner finds bail condi!on(s) as viola!ng fundamental, human, or other rights, or causing difficulty due to any situa!on, then for modifica!on of such term(s), the pe!!oner may file a reasoned applica!on before this Court, and aCer taking cognizance, even to the Court taking cognizance or the trial Court, as the case may be, and such Court shall also be competent to modify or delete any condi!on.

¶71

Any observa!on made hereinabove is neither an expression of opinion on the merits of the case nor shall the trial Court advert to these comments.

¶72

In return for the protec!on from incarcera!on, the Court believes that the accused shall also reciprocate through desirable behavior.

¶73

There would be no need for a cer�fied copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the Pe��oner can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and aCest it to be a true copy. In case the aCes�ng officer wants to verify the authen�city, such an officer can also verify its authen�city and may download and use the downloaded copy for aCes�ng bonds.

¶74

Pe%%on allowed in aforesaid terms . All pending applica!ons, if any, stand disposed.

¶75

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 07.12.2023 Jyo! Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.

¶76

Jyoti Sharma 2023.12.07 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Sector 1, High Court, Chandigarh

¶77

Vinod Patwari v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Patwari v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neeraj Vs State of Haryana

Charanjit Singh@Channi Vs State of Punjab

Shubham Vs State of Ut Chandigarh

Sandeep Singh Vs State of Punjab

Deepak Kumar Vs State of Punjab

Anil Vij Vs State of Punjab