The petitioner applied for regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connections with an NDPS case. While counsel prayed for withdrawal of the petition, the court allowed the prayer accordingly without detailed reasoning.
Order passed for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:149391
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
244
CRM-M-57809-2023 Date of decision: 23.11.2023
Malkit Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. S.S. Maini, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab.
AMAN CHAUDHARY. J.
2 . Custody certificate has been filed by learned State counsel, as per which, the petitioner is behind bars for 01 year and 04 days. One more FIR was registered against him under the NDPS Act, during the period, he was on interim bail by the trial Court in this case, on account of non-filing of the challan.
3 . Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage.
4 . Ordered accordingly.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE
23.11.2023 Ankur
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
Ankur Goyal 2023.11.24 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in the NDPS case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Malkit Singh
State of Punjab
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
