Accused sought bail under Section 439 CrPC charged with POCSO and IPC offences for sexual assault on two sleeping minor boys. Court rejected bail, noting explicit victim testimony, bleeding from anal insertion, and accused's history of repeat offences.
Bail application rejected; accused petitioner dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:160099
CRM-M-55299-2023
CRM-M-55299-2023 Reserved on: 13.12.2023 Pronounced on: 15.12.2023
Banipal
...Pe��oner
Versus
State of Haryana …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Puneet Kakkar, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Sta�on | Sec�ons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 819 | 11.12.2021 | Sector 8, |
6 of POCSO Act and Sec�on 377, 506 IPC |
| Faridabad |
Jyoti Sharma 2023.12.15 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Sector 1, High Court, Chandigarh
1
2023:PHHC:160099
CRM-M-55299-2023
7. With this explana�on, it is not a case for bail.
Pe��on dismissed. All pending applica�ons, if any, also stand disposed.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 15.12.2023 Jyo� Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.
Jyoti Sharma 2023.12.15 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Sector 1, High Court, Chandigarh
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to an accused charged under the POCSO Act for sexual assault on a minor.
Whether the medical opinion negating the extent of injury negates the credibility of the victim.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Banipal
State of Haryana
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
