Petitioner sought withdrawal of bail petition after court was not inclined to grant bail. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
212
2023:PHHC:111649 CRM-M-5408-2023 Date of decision: August 25th , 2023
Vijay Sharma
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Present: Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. Naveen Jaglan, Advocate for the complainant.
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, a prayer was made by learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal of the instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
| August 25th | , 2023 |
(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) |
|---|---|---|
| Puneet | JUDGE | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes |
|
| Whether reportable | : No |
PUNEET SACHDEVA 2023.08.25 04:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document. Chandigarh
Vijay Sharma
State of Haryana
Manjari Nehru Kaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
