Krishan @ Golu v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
247 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
247 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:047823
247 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-5244-2020 Date of Decision: April 10, 2023
KRISHAN @ GOLU
........ Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
........ Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Rajinder Yadav, Advocate for
Mr. Amit Kohar, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial has already been concluded, thereby, rendering the present petition as infructuous.
Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
10.04.2023 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) tejwinder JUDGE
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2023.04.10 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
KRISHAN @ GOLU
STATE OF HARYANA
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court