the petitioner was acquitted in an earlier FIR; the court disposed of the present petition as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-5205-2021 DATE OF DECISION:-17.01.2023
Gurmeet Singh @ Meeta
...Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Punjab
...Respondent..
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Arshdeep Singh Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Shukla, AAG, Punjab.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner already stands acquitted in the present FIR No.72 dated 24.05.2014 and, as such, nothing survives in the present petition.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as having been
rendered infructuous.
17.01.2023 (HARKESH MANUJA) sonika JUDGE
whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No whether reportable: Yes/No
SONIKA 2023.01.18 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Gurmeet Singh
State of Punjab
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
