Petitioner applied for withdrawal of criminal proceedings. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition derived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-492-2023
Date of Decision: January 24, 2023
UMED @ MONU
........ Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
........ Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. A.S. Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G. Haryana.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the
present petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
| 24.01.2023 tejwinder |
(HARK |
ESH MANUJA) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable |
Yes/No Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2023.01.25 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
UMED @ MONU
STATE OF HARYANA
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
