Petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise the plea elsewhere. The court allowed the prayer and dismissed the petition as withdrawn pursuant to the plea.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn subject to liberty to raise the plea before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:141399
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
119
CRM-M-48623-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.11.2023
Manjit Kaur Mejie
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of U.T., Chandigarh and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Present : Mr. Himanshu Raj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Anshuman Gupta, Addl. P.P. for U.T., Chandigarh.
KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL)
accordingly.
(KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE
06.11.2023
Satyawan
SATYAWAN 2023.11.06 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Manjit Kaur Mejie
State of U.T., Chandigarh
KULDEEP TIWARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
