Writ petition seeking direction to authorities to act on a complaint regarding non-action. Court disposed of the petition by directing Respondent No. 3 to decide the representation within 2 months.
Direction to Respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the annexed representation within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-4131-2023
Date of Decision:- 27.01.2023
HARINDER KUMAR SONKAR
… Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
... Respondents
-.-
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH
-.-
Present:Mr. Sahil Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Simar Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
-.-
KARAMJIT SINGH, J . (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that
representation/complaint dated 28.10.2022 (Annexure P-8) has been moved before the concerned authorities, but no action has been taken as of now. The counsel for the petitioner(s) further submitted that he will be satisfied if necessary direction is given to respondent No.3 to take action on the aforesaid representation.
Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 4, at this stage.
Mr. M.S. Nagra, AAG, Punjab has accepted notice on behalf of
the aforesaid respondents and submits that the concerned authority will look
GAURAV SOROT 2023.01.31 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order, judgment and documents.
( 2 ) CRM-M-4131-2023
into the matter and take decision on the representation of the petitioner(s) in accordance with law.
In the light of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-8) in accordance with law within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
27.01.2023 Gaurav Sorot
( KARAMJIT SINGH) JUDGE
Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No
GAURAV SOROT 2023.01.31 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order, judgment and documents.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the concerned authority must decide the pending representation within a specified time.
HARINDER KUMAR SONKAR
STATE OF PUNJAB
KARAMJIT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
