Petitioner complained of police inaction on FIR. Court, satisfied by an undertaking from the State, disposed of the petition directing the authority to consider a specific representation within two months.
Direction to respondent No.4 to consider and decide representation dated 26.12.2022 within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-3779-2023 Date of Decision:- 24.01.2023
ALTAF
… Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
... Respondents
-.-
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH
-.-
Present:Mr. Aezaj Ahmed, Advocate for Mr. Aadil, Advocate for the petitioner.
-.-
KARAMJIT SINGH, J . (Oral)
The counsel for the petitioner submits that after registration of the FIR the police failed to take any action against the accused persons in criminal case having FIR No.225 dated 14.10.2021 (Annexure P-1) and that in this regard different representations Annexure P-5 to Annexure P-8 are submitted to police authorities but they failed to take any action. The counsel for the petitioner further submitted that he will be satisfied if necessary direction is given to respondent No.4 to take action on representation dated 26.12.2022 (Annexure P-6).
Notice of motion.
Mr. Naveen Kumar Sheoran, DAG, Haryana has accepted notice
GAURAV SOROT 2023.01.24 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order, judgment and documents.
( 2 ) CRM-M-3779-2023
on behalf of the respondents and submits that the concerned authority will look into the matter and take decision on the representation of the petitioner(s) in accordance with law.
In the light of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to consider and decide the representation dated 26.12.2022 (Annexure P-6) in accordance with law within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
24.01.2023 Gaurav Sorot
( KARAMJIT SINGH) JUDGE
Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No
GAURAV SOROT 2023.01.24 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order, judgment and documents.
Altaf
State of Haryana
Karamjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
