The High Court permitted the withdrawal of the petitioner's bail petition (CRM-M-35981-2014) following an order of even date, discharging the present petition and any pending applications.
Bail petition disposed of as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:145541
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
239
CRM-M-35981-2014
Date of Decision: 16.11.2023
Inderjit Singh
....Pe��oner
Versus
State of Punjab and another ....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. D.V. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sunder Kumari, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. Ravinder Singh, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Ashish Grover, Advocate for respondent No.2.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
In view of the order of even date passed in CRM-M-33359-2016, pe��oner’s counsel seeks permission to withdraw the present pe��on.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
16.11.2023 anju rani
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/no Whether reportable? Yes/no
ANJU RANI 2023.11.17 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Inderjit Singh
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
