This oral judgment holds that a notice to the appellant could not be served due to unavailability of address and the appellant appears to have lost interest, leading to dismissal for non-prosecution.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.274
2023:PHHC:120839
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-A-335-MA-2013 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.09.2023
Suresh Kumar …Appellant Vs. State of Haryana and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: None for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Karan Garg, AAG, Haryana.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Matter was called out for hearing on 09.05.2023, following order
was passed:-
“ It has been submitted that the arguing counsel Mr. Sanjay Vashisth has been elevated to the Bench and the applicant is not contactable.
Let notice be issued to the applicant for 13.09.2023.”
Apropos, notice was issued to the applicant. Same could not be served due to lack of address. No useful purpose would be served to issue fresh notice. It seems that applicant-appellant has lost interest in pursuing the case. Same is accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE
13.09.2023 vandana
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
VANDANA 2023.09.14 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Suresh Kumar
State of Haryana
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
