Balvir Kaur Vs State of Punjab

Present: - Mr. Puran Singh Hundal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gursahib Singh Hundal, Mr. Ankush Chauhan and Mr. Imaan Singh Khara, Advocates for the petitioner.

¶10

Ms. Monika Jalota, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

¶11

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶12

Prayer in this petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.27, dated 19.03.2023, under Sections 279, 188, 212, 216, 109 and 120-B of IPC, besides Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Mehatpur, District Jalandhar.

¶13

The only role attributed to the petitioner is to have provided shelter and to have helped the co-accused in fleeing and running away from the police.

¶14

Learned State counsel concedes that the said role of the petitioner attracts at the most Section 216 IPC, which is a bailable offence.

¶15

Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, but without commenting anything upon the merits of the case, petitioner is admitted to bail. She is ordered to be released on bail on her furnishing requisite bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.

¶16

Allowed.

¶17

October 12, 2023 sarita

¶18

(DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶19

SARITA RANI Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No 2023.10.11 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/order

Balvir Kaur v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balvir Kaur v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagjit Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Raman Kumar Alias Raman Mahajan Vs State of Punjab

Sandeep Negi and Another Vs State of Haryana and Another

Harpal Singh Vs State of Haryana and Another

Baljinder Alias Veeru Vs State of Haryana

Neeraj Alias Rana Vs State of Punjab