Single judge disposed of a Cr.P.C. petition without commenting on merits, directing respondents to decide a representation within four weeks.
Direction to respondents No.2 & 3 to decide the representation dated 25.04.2022 within four weeks from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-2954-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-2954-2023 Date of Decision: January 20, 2023
Jagbir
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for
Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
HARKESH MANUJA, J (ORAL)
By way of present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for directing respondent No.2 to take a final decision on the application dated 25.04.2022 (P-4) within some specified time especially in view of order dated 27.02.2020 (P-2); whereby proceedings under Section 145/146 Cr.P.C. has been ordered to be dropped.
Referring to an order dated 27.02.2020 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Panipat, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite there being a direction issued to the Incharge, Police Station, Israna, the possession of Samadhi Mandir, Village Pardahana has not been handed over to Mandir Committee. Learned counsel also submits that in this regard, petitioners have been repeatedly approaching the concerned Incharge of Police Station, Israna despite having made representation dated 25.04.2022 to SDM, Panipat (P-4 at page 40), however, no steps have been taken.
Notice of motion.
SANJAY GUPTA 2023.01.20 19:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1
CRM-M-2954-2023
Mr. Sumit Jain, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.
Without commenting upon merits of the case and in view of the submissions made hereinabove, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.2 & 3 to look into the matter and decide the representation dated 25.04.2022 (P-4) submitted by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today.
January 20, 2023 [HARKESH MANUJA] sanjay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned yes/no Whether reportable? yes/no
SANJAY GUPTA 2023.01.20 19:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagbir
State of Haryana
HARKESH MANUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
