Allowed

Gurdavar Singh @ Veeru and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC11 Aug 2023CRM-M/25596/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed two petitions seeking quashing of an FIR and related proceedings. Relying on a report confirming a verified, voluntary compromise between parties and citing relevant precedents, the Court quashed the charges.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIR No.147, General Diary/Rapat No.028, and all subsequent consequential proceedings.

Gurdavar Singh @ Veeru and Anr. Vs State of Punjab… — Quashing and FIR | Punjab & Haryana HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

253 2023:PHHC:104488 1. CRM-M-25596-2023 Date of decision: August 11^th , 2023

¶3

Gurdavar Singh @ Veeru and another

¶4

.....Petitioners

¶5

Versus .....Respondents

¶6

State of Punjab and another 2. CRM-M-25625-2023

¶7

Harjot Singh @ Jot and another

¶8

.....Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State of Punjab and another

¶11

.....Respondents

¶12

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

¶13

Present : Mr. Varun Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners (in CRM-M-25596-2023).

¶14

Mr. Amandeep S. Meho, Advocate for the petitioners (in CRM-M-25625-2023).

¶15

��

¶16

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)

¶17

Prayer in the instant petitions is for quashing of FIR No.147 dated 03.12.2022 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 323, 452, 34 IPC as well as General Diary/Rapat No.028 dated 25.12.2022 under Sections 323, 342, 50, 34 IPC registered at Police Station Bhogpur, District Jalandhar Rural, along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

¶18

Vide order dated 19.05.2023 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa

¶19

PUNEET SACHDEVA 2023.08.12 06:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document. Chandigarh

¶20

CRM-M-25596 and 25625-2023

¶21

-2-

¶22

Magistrate on 05.07.2023 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them.

¶23

Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jalandhar, in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the complainant has also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioner is quashed.

¶24

The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original along with its report.

¶25

Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and respondent No.2 is the only aggrieved person in the FIR/Rapat in question.

¶26

In view of the report of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Jalandhar and the principles laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 , and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 , the instant petitions are allowed. The aforesaid FIR as well as General Diary/Rapat and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

¶27

PUNEET SACHDEVA 2023.08.12 06:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document. Chandigarh

¶28

CRM-M-25596 and 25625-2023

¶29

-3-

¶30

Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below.

¶31

Copy of this order be placed on the file of connected

¶32

case.

¶33

August 11^th , 2023 ( MANJARI NEHRU KAUL ) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶34

PUNEET SACHDEVA 2023.08.12 06:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document. Chandigarh

Gurdavar Singh @ Veeru and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurdavar Singh @ Veeru and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pooja @ Kajal Vs U.T. Chandigarh

Chukwudi Samson Vs State of U.T. Chandigarh

Fajru @ Fazruddin and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Parkash Kaur and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Rajinder Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Another

Ravinder Singh @ Ravi and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Others