Allowed

Hardeep Singh@Cheeni v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC8 Nov 2023CRM-M/15079/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under IPC Sections 307, 324, 323, 506, 148, 149, and 120-B, noting injury statements did not implicate the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner admitted to bail on furnishing requisite bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

Hardeep Singh@Cheeni Vs State of Punjab — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Punjab & Haryana HC (2023)

¶1

106+220 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Neutral Citation No. 2023:PHHC:142722 CRM-39355-2023 in/and CRM-M-15079-2023 Date of Decision: November 08, 2023

¶3

Hardeep Singh alias Cheeni

…Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

…Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

¶9

Present: - Mr. Amaninder Singh Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. M.S. Nagra, AAG, Punjab.

¶11

Mr. B.S. Bairagi, Advocate for the complainant.

¶12

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶13

CRM-39355-2023

¶14

This is an application to place on record uncertified copies of statements of PW3 Gurpiar Singh, PW4 Mohinder Singh and PW6 Ranjit Singh as Annexures P-12 to P-14.

¶15

Copies supplied. There is no objection from the other side. Allowed.

¶16

Annexures P-12 to P-14 are taken on record.

¶17

Main Case

¶18

By way of present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., prayer is made for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.64, dated 10.04.2022, under Sections 307, 324, 323, 506, 148, 149 and 120-B of IPC (Sections 326 and 325 of IPC added later on vide DDR No.30, dated 17.05.2022), registered at Police Station Sadar Faridkot, District Faridkot.

¶19

By pointing out towards the statements of the injuredwitnesses Gurpiar Singh, Mohinder Singh and Ranjit Singh as Annexures P-12 to P-14 as made by them during trial, it is contended by learned SARITA RANI 2023.11.07 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/order

¶20

Neutral Citation No. 2023:PHHC:142722 CRM-39355-2023 in/and CRM-M-15079-2023

¶21

- 2 -

¶22

counsel for the petitioner that none of them have attributed any injury to the petitioner.

¶23

The aforesaid position is not refuted either by learned State counsel or by the counsel for the complainant.

¶24

Co-accused Manpreet Singh @ Ghona has already been allowed bail by this Court vide order dated 06.09.2023 passed in CRMM-33739-2023.

¶25

As per custody certificate placed on record by learned State counsel, petitioner is in custody for the last 01 year, 06 months and 02 days, with no criminal antecedent.

¶26

Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, but without commenting anything on the merits of the case, petitioner is admitted to bail. He is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing requisite bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.

¶27

Allowed.

¶28

November 08, 2023 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶29

SARITA RANI 2023.11.07 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/order

Hardeep Singh@Cheeni v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hardeep Singh@Cheeni v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arman Vs State of Haryana

Baljeet Singh @ Ladoo Vs State of Punjab

Pankaj Vs State of Punjab and Another

Kuldeep Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Another

Mohit Lathar Vs State of Haryana and Another

Ranjeet Kumar Vs M/S. Shree Ram Transport Finance Company Ltd. and Another