Petitioner filed a writ petition. Petitioner's counsel appeared. The trial court in the underlying matter has concluded prosecution evidence. Petition disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation Number 2023:PHHC:069072 Page No. -:1:Case Number CRM-M-14712-2021 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-14712-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 12.05.2023
MOHIT KUMAR
… Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
... Respondents
-.-
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH
-.-
Present:Mr. P.K.S. Phoolka, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanish Girdhar, AAG, Punjab.
-.-
KARAMJIT SINGH, J . (Oral)
| 12.05.2023 | ( KARAMJIT SINGH) JUDGE |
|---|---|
| Gaurav Sorot | |
| Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No |
|
| Whether reportable? Yes / No |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition needs adjudication when the prosecution evidence in the underlying criminal case has concluded.
Mohit Kumar
State of Punjab
Karamjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
