The High Court dismissed the applicant-appellant's appeal and application for condonation of delay due to non-appearance despite opportunity to argue, noting the appellant no longer sought to pursue the matter.
Application for leave to appeal and for condonation of delay dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Neutral Citation No. 2023:PHHC:145083 CRM-1752-2018 in/and CRM-A136-MA-2018 Date of Decision: November 15, 2023
Harjit Singh
… Applicant-appellant
Versus
Ranjit Singh …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - None.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
There is no representation on behalf of the applicantappellant. On the last date of hearing also, nobody had put in appearance on behalf of the applicant-appellant, despite the fact that learned counsel had been informed through e-mail, as reported by the Registry. Today was the last opportunity to argue the matter. It appears that the applicantappellant is no longer interested in pursuing this application for grant of leave to appeal.
The application for condonation of delay as well as the main appeal against acquittal are dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
November 15, 2023 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SARITA RANI 2023.11.14 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/order
Ranjit Singh
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
