The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of an incoming petition on the withdrawal application filed by the petitioner, Ajay Masih.
Petition stood disposed of having been withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:064033
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
216 CRM-M-12502-2023
Date of Decision: 04.05.2023
Ajay Masih ......... Pe��oner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:Mr. Azad Khan, Advocate for the pe��oner and Mr. S.S. Momi, Legal Aid Counsel for the pe��oner.
Ms. Navreet K. Barnala, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Umesh Aggarwala, Advocate for respondents No. 4 and 5.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
Mr. Azad Khan, Advocate for the pe��oner has appeared in the Court and
submits that he wants to withdraw the present pe��on.
Given above, present pe��on stands disposed of having been withdrawn. All
pending miscellaneous applica�ons, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
04.05.2023 Jyo�-II
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
JYOTI 2023.05.05 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Ajay Masih
State of Punjab and others
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
