The Punjab and Haryana High Court permitted the withdrawal of a revision petition compounding between the parties, dismissing it as withdrawn and disposing pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:046321
245
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-8377-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.03.2023
Sukhdev Singh ....Petitioner
VERSUS
Surinder Kaur and Others ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. H.S.Batth, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Raminder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.
-.-
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present revision petition in view of the fact that the as per his instructions the matter has been compromised between the parties. Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
March 28, 2023 (ALKA SARIN) tripti JUDGE
NOTE : Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : YES/NO
TRIPTI SAINI 2023.03.29 12:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Sukhdev Singh
Surinder Kaur and Others
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
