Single judge orally disposed of a civil revision petition as infructuous since the Presiding Officer against whom allegations were made was transferred. Pending applications were also disposed.
The revision petition and pending applications were disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
268
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CIVIL REVISION NO. 509 OF 2020 DATE OF DECISION: 18.01.2023
Balwant Singh …Petitioner
Versus
Harwinder Singh and another …Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : Mr. Onkar Rai, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate, For the respondents.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the Presiding Officer, against whom there were allegations in the transfer petition, has since been transferred from Ludhiana and as such, nothing survives in the instant revision petition and the same has been rendered infructuous.
In the premise, the instant revision petition is disposed of as
infructuous.
Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of, accordingly.
JANUARY 18, 2023 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2023.01.24 11:46
Balwant Singh
Harwinder Singh
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
