A revision petition filed in the High Court of Punjab & Haryana was dismissed as withdrawn on account of an amicable settlement reached by the parties. The matter does not involve substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R. No. 4820 of 2017 -1-
2023:PHHC:067462
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No. 4820 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 10.5.2023
Rajender Singh (deceased) through his LRs and others
................Petitioners
vs.
Bhagat Singh
.................Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan
Present: Mr. R.P. Dangi, Advocate for Mr. V.M. Handa, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Jitender Nara, Advocate for the respondent.
H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral)
As per report received from Mediation and Concilliation Centre of this Court, the matter has been resolved amicably between the parties. Settlement/ compromise alongwith Annexures has been enclosed with the report, which be made part of the record.
Learned counsel for the revision petitioners states that in view of such Settlement/Compromise, which for convenience of reference is exhibited as Exhibit C-1, revision petitioners do not want to proceed further with the revision petition and it be disposed of accordingly.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent, while
BANITA CHUGH 2023.05.12 11:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
C.R. No. 4820 of 2017 -2-
admitting the Settlement/Compromise, states that he has no objection if the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners is accepted.
Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn
as compromised in terms of Settlement/Compromise Exhibit C-1. The parties shall remain bound by this Settlement/Compromise.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-plaintiff prays that a direction be issued for refund of the court fee affixed on the plaint and on the grounds of appeal before the Ist Appellate Court.
He may move appropriate applications in the Courts concerned, which may then dispose of the same in accordance with law.
10.5.2023 chugh
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No
Whether reportable Yes / No
BANITA CHUGH 2023.05.12 11:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rajender Singh (deceased) through his LRs and others
Bhagat Singh
H. S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
