Gurnam Singh v. Surinder Singh Mann and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
253 CR-467-2020 Date of decision: 02.03.2023
GURNAM SINGH
..Petitioner(s)
Versus
SURINDER SINGH MANN AND OTHERS
..Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: Mr. Gurinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr. Sahil Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.2.
NIDHI GUPTA, J (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the main suit filed by respondent
No.1 has been dismissed.
Disposed of as infructuous.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) 02.03.2023 JUDGE ashok
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2023.03.02 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gurnam Singh
Surinder Singh Mann
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court