Revision petition dismissed as infructuous because vacant possession of premises was handed over to the respondent-landlord.
Revision petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:040808
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
355-3 CR No.4419 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.03.2023
Surinder Singh ....Petitioner
VERSUS Rabinder Singh ....Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Sehgal, Advocate for the respondent.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondent states that the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous inasmuch as the vacant possession of the demised premises has since been handed over to the respondent-landlord.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to get the present revision petition revived in case anything survives. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
20.03.2023 jk
( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2023.03.21 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh
Surinder Singh
Rabinder Singh
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
