The petition to quash the main petition was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying main petition had already been dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications were disposed off.
Revision petition dismissed as infructuous; pending applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:038207
253
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-4211-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision : 13.03.2023
Puneet Garg ....Petitioner
VERSUS
Neha Singla ....Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
-.-
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous inasmuch as the main petition itself stands dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above, the present revision petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
March 13, 2023 (ALKA SARIN) tripti JUDGE
NOTE : Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : YES/NO
TRIPTI SAINI 2023.03.14 12:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Puneet Garg
Neha Singla
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
