Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution as no party appeared. Petitioner absent; conditional arrest warrant was in force from initial filing.
Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
254
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R No. 421 of 2020 DATE OF DECISION : 02.02.2023
Sourabh Bhola …Petitioner
versus
Canara Bank and another …Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : None for the petitioner.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
1. None appears on behalf of petitioner.
for petitioner was present and even learned counsel for respondent-bank also caused appearance, as recorded in order of said date. Matter is called out today but none has appeared on behalf of petitioner. It appears that revision petition has been rendered infructuous as there was no stay granted by this Court, while at the same time, a conditional arrest warrant was issued against the petitioner at the time when the petition was filed.
FEBRUARY 02, 2023 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2023.02.07 11:32
Sourabh Bhola
Canara Bank
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
