Coram dismissed the revision petition as infructuous since the main petition in the lower court had already been disposed of. Pending applications were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
263 CR No.3791 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision : 07.02.2023
Deepak Sharma ....Petitioner
VERSUS
Poornima Sharma ....Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Charanit Singh, Advocate for Mr. A.P. Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the respondent.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondent states that as per E-Court
website of the District Courts, Jalandhar, the main petition has since been disposed off.
In view thereof, the present revision petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
( ALKA SARIN ) 07.02.2023 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2023.02.08 08:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh
Deepak Sharma
Poornima Sharma
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
