Writ petition under Article 226 challenging the refusal by the Rent Controller to implead a co-owner tenant. Petitioner withdrew the petition; matters remanded to Rent Controller to proceed after impleadment.
Dismissal of writ petition as withdrawn. Respondents directed to proceed after impleadment of Anjali Gupta.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
114
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-252-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.01.2023
Rajinder Kumar Goyal ..…Petitioner
Versus
Som Nath Garg, Deceased (Through LRs.) and Another ….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: Mr. Ishan Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Petition herein,under Article 227 of Constitution of India, is for setting aside order dated 17.11.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Rent Controller, Sangrur, whereby the application filed by petitioner/tenant under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC to substitute/implead Smt. Anjali Gupta, daughter of landlady, namely, Smt.Achri Devi, being a co-owner of the demise premises by virtue of registered transfer deed executed by Smt. Achri Devi, has been declined.
(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE January 16, 2023 ashish Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
ASHISH 2023.01.17 19:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Rent Controller's refusal to implead a co-owner needs to be allowed?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
RAJINDER KUMAR GOYAL
SOM NATH GARG
ARUN MONGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
