The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a revision petition for non-prosecution after the petitioners' counsel failed to appear on the scheduled hearing date following a warning against further adjournments.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:048646
293
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-1314-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision : 10.04.2023
Kulwant Singh and Another ....Petitioners
VERSUS
Balram Kumar and Another ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
On 27.09.2022 the following order was passed :
“A request for an adjournment has been made on behalf of arguing counsel for the petitioners on the ground that he is in personal difficulty.
In the interest of justice, adjourned to 11.01.2023. It is made clear that no further adjournment shall be granted and in case the matter is not argued on the next date of hearing, the same shall be dismissed for non-prosecution.”
Today the case has been called twice but none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. This Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present revision petition for non-prosecution.
Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
April 10, 2023 (ALKA SARIN) tripti JUDGE
NOTE : Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : YES/NO
TRIPTI SAINI 2023.04.11 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Kulwant Singh and Another
Balram Kumar and Another
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
