Petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners were absent without representation on the date of hearing and showed lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
2023:PHHC:059167
251 CR-1101-2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.04.2023
PEHLAD SINGH AND OTHERS
..Petitioners
Versus
ANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Suresh K. Kaushik, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3.
NIDHI GUPTA, J (Oral)
Order sheets show that on the last date of hearing i.e. 14.11.2022, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Even
today, no one appears for the petitioners. It seems that petitioners are not
interested in pursuing the present petition.
Dismissed for non prosecution.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) 26.04.2023 JUDGE ashok
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2023.04.27 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Pehlad Singh and Others
Anil Kumar and Others
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
