Petitioner permitted to withdraw writ petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy. Order is non-speaking.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
101
2023:PHHC:092895
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-688-2013 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.07.2023
Paramjeet Kaur
....Petitioner
Versus
D.P.S. Nagal and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. B.S. Sudan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. P.K. Longia, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Rishu Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Verma, Advo for respondent No.1.
Mr. R.D. Bawa, Advocate with Mr. Dipanshu Kapur, Advocate for respondent No.2/HUDA.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
After arguing the matter for some time, counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy in accordance with law.
Ordered accordingly.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN)
JUDGE
24.07.2023 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MOHD YAKUB 2023.07.24 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Paramjeet Kaur
D.P.S. Nagal
another
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
