Taranjit Kaur v. Anurag Agarwal
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge allowed the petition as rendered infructuous following an affidavit taken on record by the respondent.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed as rendered infructuous.
Single judge allowed the petition as rendered infructuous following an affidavit taken on record by the respondent.
Petition allowed as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
222
2023:PHHC:102035
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-671-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.08.2023
Taranjit Kaur
....Petitioner
Versus
Anurag Agarwal
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Lakshay Goel, Advocate for Mr. H.P.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Divya Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
CM-12586-CII-2023
Heard.
Allowed as prayed for.
Compliance affidavit on behalf of the respondent is taken
on record.
COCP-671-2021 (O&M)
Counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be
disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN)
| 08.08.2023 | JUDGE | |
|---|---|---|
| yakub | Whether speaking/reasoned: | Yes/No |
| Whether reportable: | Yes/No |
MOHD YAKUB 2023.08.08 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Taranjit Kaur
Anurag Agarwal
Arvind Singh Sangwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court