Petitioner's interim petition was disposed of as infructuous since the main petition was dismissed by the trial court, with liberty granted to approach Statutory Authority.
Petition disposed as infructuous; liberty granted to avail alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
296
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-662-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.02.2023
Priyanka
....Petitioner
Versus
Anindita Mitra
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sehajbir Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
Counsel for the respondent has placed on record the judgment dated 13.07.2022 vide which the main petition was dismissed.
Since the interim order merges in the final order, this petition is disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy in accordance with law, if so advised.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE
06.02.2023 yakub
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MOHD YAKUB 2023.02.06 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Priyanka
Anindita Mitra
Arvind Singh Sangwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
