A single-paragraph oral order in a writ petition where the High Court refused to consider the merits, finding the petition infructuous due to a passed speaking order, but granted liberty to pursue alternative remedies if advised.
Petition declared infructuous; liberty granted to approach alternative remedies if advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
295
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-2611-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.02.2023
Joginder Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
Inderbir Singh
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Hoshiar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harsh Vardhan Shehrawat, AAG, Haryana.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
Counsel for the State submits that since necessary compliance has been made and a speaking order (Annexure R-1) has been passed, this petition may be disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy in accordance with law, if so advised.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE
27.02.2023 yakub
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MOHD YAKUB 2023.02.27 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Joginder Singh
Inderbir Singh
Arvind Singh Sangwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
