Petitioner sought disposition of salary arrears petition. Court allowed argument but relegated claimant to alternative remedy regarding arrears.
Petitioner relegated to avail alternative remedy regarding arrears of salary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
104
Neutral Citation No.2023:PHHC:040940
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1432-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.03.2023
Mukesh Kumar
....Petitioner
Versus
Rajiv Rattan and Anr
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Sandeep Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. P.K. Longia, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. S.S. Khurana, Advocate for respondent No.2.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
After arguing the matter for some time, counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of, however, with regard to the arrears of salary, if any, the petitioner may be relegated to avail his alternative remedy.
Ordered accordingly.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN)
JUDGE
21.03.2023
yakub
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MOHD YAKUB 2023.03.21 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Mukesh Kumar
Rajiv Rattan and Anr
Arvind Singh Sangwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
