Petitioner sought arbitrator appointment under Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Court, after mediation report and receipt of payment from respondent via cheque, found matter resolved and disposed of petition as infructuous.
Petition disposed of as infructuous due to amicable settlement and payment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:128629
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
ARB-67-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision:-4.10.2023
Sohan Lal … Petitioner
Versus
Indus Tower Limited
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. M.S. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Pankaj Kakkar 2023.10.04 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
ARB-67-2023 (O&M) ( 2 )
2023:PHHC:128629
4.10.2023 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
Pankaj Kakkar 2023.10.04 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the petition for appointment of an arbitrator since the parties have amicably settled the matter with payment made.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sohan Lal
Indus Tower Limited
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
