Petitioner application to withdraw pending writ petition (TA No.84 of 2020) allowed by learned palate dismissing without further orders.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
213
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TA No.84 of 2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.07.2022
Leena Sharma
....Petitioner
Versus
Anuj Sharma
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Deepak Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be
permitted to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE
08.07.2022 yakub
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
MOHD YAKUB 2022.07.08 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Leena Sharma
Anuj Sharma
Arvind Singh Sangwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
