Allowed

Geeta Rani Sharma v. Diljeet Sharma

Punjab & Haryana HC30 Aug 2022TA/109/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a transfer petition filed by a wife requesting to shift her husband's divorce petition from Khanna to Moga. Considering the distance, travel hardship for the wife with a minor child, and Supreme Court precedents, the court ordered the transfer to Moga and directed the new court to assign the case and refer it to mediation.

What did the court decide?

The petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act pending before the Family Court, Khanna is transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Moga.

Geeta Rani Sharma Vs Diljeet Sharma — Matrimonial and Divorce | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

¶1

TA-109-2021

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

TA-109-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 30.08.2022

Geeta Rani

....Petitioner

Vs.

Diljeet Sharma

....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN

¶11

Present: Ms. Harleen Ahluwalia, Advocate for Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

None for the respondent.

¶13

¶14

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral)

¶15

Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending before the Family Court, Khanna, District Ludhiana to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Moga.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that on account of matrimonial discord, the petitioner has submitted a representation against the respondent to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga. It is further submitted that the petitioner is facing great difficulty in prosecuting the petition filed by the respondent, as there is a distance of about 100 kms from

¶17

VISHNU 2022.08.30 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

TA-109-2021

-2-

Moga to Khanna.

Learned counsel has further contended that the petitioner is having a minor child, who is living in her care and custody and she is facing difficulty to defend the case, as she has to travel from Moga to Khanna.

¶22

Learned counsel has relied upon the judgments Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay, 2002 SC 396 and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi Vs. Kishor Babulal Pardeshi, 2005(12) SCC 237 , wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that while deciding the transfer application, the Courts are required to give more weightage and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to another should ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female litigants under undue hardships.”

¶23

Learned counsel has further relied upon N.C.V. Aishwarya Vs. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha, 2022 Live Law (SC) 627, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court held as under: -

¶24

“The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their

¶25

VISHNU 2022.08.30 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

¶26

TA-109-2021

¶27

-3-

¶28

livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife’s convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.

¶29

Further, when two or more proceedings are pending in different Courts between the same parties which raise common question of fact and law, and when the decisions in the cases are interdependent, it is desirable that they should be tried together by the same Judge so as to avoid multiplicity in trial of the same issues and conflict of decisions.”

¶30

As per office report, the respondent is served, however, there is

¶31

no representation on his behalf.

¶32

It is well settled that while considering the transfer of a matrimonial dispute/case at the instance of the wife, the Court is to consider family condition of the wife, custody of the minor child, economic condition of the wife, her physical health and earning capacity of the husband and most important, convenience of the wife i.e. she cannot travel alone without assistance of a male member of her family, connectivity of the place to and fro from her place of residence as well as bearing of the litigation charges and travelling expenses.

¶33

After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, considering the fact that the petitioner-wife will have to bear the litigation expenses and transportation expenses and in view of the judgments in Sumita Singh’ s case (supra), Rajani Kishor Pardeshi’ s case (supra) and N.C.V. Aishwarya ’s case (supra) passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, this Court

¶34

VISHNU 2022.08.30 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

¶35

-4-

¶36

TA-109-2021

¶37

deem it appropriate to allow the present petition, subject to the following conditions:-

¶38

1. The petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending before the Family Court, Khanna, District Ludhiana will be transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Moga.

¶39

2. The District Judge, Moga will assign the said petition to the competent Court of jurisdiction.

¶40

3. The Family Court, Khanna, District Ludhiana is directed to transfer all the record pertaining to the aforesaid case to District Judge, Moga.

¶41

4. The parties are directed to appear before the Family Court, Moga within a period of 01 month from today.

¶42

5. The Family Court, Moga will make all the endeavour to refer the case before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre for exploring the possibility of amicable settlement between the parties.

¶43

6. The Court concerned, where the litigations between the parties are pending, will accommodate them with one date in one calender month.

¶44

Present petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶45

[ ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN ]

¶46

JUDGE

¶47

30.08.2022

¶48

vishnu