Satosh v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a reference order indicating that the current appeal and its accompanying order share the same date and reasoning as another case (RFA No. 3238 of 2017) and Regular First Appeal No. 458 of 2016. No independent reasoning or disposition is provided in this text.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.3238 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.03.2022
Santosh Kumari
..Appellant (s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..Respondent (s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
PresentMr. Aashish Chopra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Gurpreet Randhawa, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Kaushik, Advocate Mr. S.P. Chahar, Advocate, Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate, Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Singal, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate, Ms. Anita Balyan, Advocate, Mr. Viresh Dahiya, Advocate, Mr. Deepak Girotra, Advocate, Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. N.C. Kinra, Advocate, Mr. Harsh Kinra, Advocate, Mr. Pardeep Singh Poonia, Advocate, Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate, Mr. S.P. Khatri, Advocate, Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, Advocate, Mr. M.S. Rana, Advocate, Mr. M.S. Khillan, Advocate, Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate, Mr. Y.P. Malik, Advocate, Mr. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate, Mr. S.R. Hooda, Advocate, Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Advocate, Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate, Mr. Kamal Mor, Advocate, Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate for the landowners.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Santosh Kumari
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
Anil Kshetarpal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/3238/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court