Application seeking to implead applicants as respondents was dismissed. Leave granted to challenge the office order later passed after affording an opportunity of hearing.
Leave granted to challenge the University's office order later passed after hearing; application for impleading dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
266
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RA-CW-23-2021 (O&M) in CWP-19928-2017 Date of decision: 12.05.2022
NARINDER SINGH GUSAIN ..Applicant
versus PUNJAB UNIVERSITY AND ANOTHER …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: Mr. Arvind Galav, Advocate, For the applicant/proposed respondents No.3 to 25.
Ms. Promila Nain, Advocate, For the non-applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Subhash Ahuja, Advocate, For the non-applicant/University.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
CM-1063-CWP-2021
This is an application for impleading the applicants as respondents No.3 to 25.
No grounds are made out to interfere.
Dismissed.
RA-CW-23-2021
No fresh grounds worthy of interference are made out.
Dismissed. However, review applicants are at liberty to challenge the office order of the University, which in any case, was passed after affording them an opportunity of hearing.
(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE
May 12, 2022 vandana
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
VANDANA 2022.05.13 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Narinder Singh Gusain
Punjab University
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
