Petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 9997 of 2017. This court issued a reliance on the judgment dated 18.01.2022 in Writ Petition No. 7138 of 2017 (Vikas and others), declaring the present case partly allowed and disposed of without recording separate reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 9997 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.01.2022
Anil and others …Petitioners versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents
Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arun Monga
Present : Mr. D. S. Rawat, Advocate, for the petitioners..
Ms. Shruti Jain Goyal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
Arun Monga, J.
For the detailed reasons recorded vide judgment of even date in CWP No. 7138 of 2017 Vikas and others vs The State of Haryana and another , the present writ petition is partly allowed and disposed of.
18.01.2022 (Arun Monga) vs Judge Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
VARINDER SINGH 2022.02.18 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vikas and others vs The State of Haryana and another, CWP No. 7138 of 2017Referred¶8
Anil and others
State of Haryana and another
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
