Petitioner challenged denial of 10 marks for recruitment but failed to meet height criteria (183.5 cm vs required 184 cm). Petition dismissed; Rs.1 lakh deposit forfeited to welfare fund.
Petition dismissed; Rs.1 lakh deposit forfeited to Poor Patients Welfare Fund.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.9644 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision.25.05.2022
Pardeep Sharma
...Petitioner
Vs
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tapan Kumar Yadav, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Nishant Jindal, Advocate for
Mr. Anil Mehta, Senior Standing Counsel, U.T., Chandigarh.
-.-
JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL)
In pursuance of order dated 09.05.2022, height of the petitioner has been re-measured by the Board of Doctors of Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh. A report of the Board of Doctors dated 20.05.2022 has been received in the sealed cover, according to which, height of the petitioner is 183.5 cm and therefore, the petitioner is not entitled for 10 marks as per clause 2.3 of the advertisement No.2/2021, according to which 10 marks are to be provided for height from 184 cm and above. The report dated 20.05.2022 is taken on record and marked as Annexure A.
Consequently, the instant petition stands dismissed as the petitioner does not fulfill the requisite criteria of height to make him entitled for 10 marks. The amount of Rs.1 lakh deposited by the petitioner before the Registrar of this Court is forfeited and ordered to be deposited with Poor Patients Welfare Fund of GMCH, Sector 32, Chandigarh in terms of order dated 09.05.2022.
| May 25, 2022 | (JA |
ISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|
| Pankaj* | Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
| Whether reportable | Yes/No |
PANKAJ KUMAR 2022.05.26 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Pardeep Sharma
State of Haryana
another
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
