The High Court dismissed a constitutionally insecure petition as having been rendered infructuous because the impugned order stands withdrawn. No separate reasons were delivered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.9265 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision.02.05.2022
Mahadev Singh
...Petitioner
Vs
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Mr. R.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Ambika Bedi, AAG, Punjab.
-.-
JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the instant petition
has been rendered infructuous, as the impugned order stands withdrawn.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(JAISHREE THAKUR)
JUDGE
May 02, 2022 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2022.05.05 11:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Mahadev Singh
State of Punjab
JAISHREE THAKUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
