Sumit Mor v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought appointment as Male Constable for being recommended. Court found the advertisement was held as infructuous.
Petitioner sought appointment as Male Constable for being recommended. Court found the advertisement was held as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.903 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision.05.07.2022
Sumit Mor
...Petitioner
Vs
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Mr. Parshant Sethi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tapan Kumar Yadav, DAG, Haryana.
-.-
JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL)
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking appointment as Male Constable, pursuant to having participated in the Advertisement No.4/2020.
Counsel for the respondent-State would submit that on 23.06.2022, the name of the petitioner has been recommended for appointment to the post of Male Constable by the Haryana Staff Selection Commission and therefore, nothing survives for consideration in the instant petition.
In view of the recommendation of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Male Constable, nothing survives for consideration in the instant writ petition and the same is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(JAISHREE THAKUR)
JUDGE July 05, 2022 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2022.07.07 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Sumit Mor
State of Haryana
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court