The petition was disposed of by dismissal as the petitioner submitted that the writ petition had been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.7909 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.26.07.2022
Gurmeet Singh Mann
...Petitioner
Vs
State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pawan Sharda, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
Mr. H.S. Bedi, Advocate for respondent No.2.
-.-
JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition
has been rendered infructuous and seeks dismissal of the same as such.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(JAISHREE THAKUR)
JUDGE
July 26, 2022 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2022.07.27 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Gurmeet Singh Mann
State of Punjab
another
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
