Single judge disposed of a writ petition seeking issuance of a weapon license. The court issued notice of motion and directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's legal notice within two months, imposing personal cost liability for delays.
Dated two months to consider legal notice and decide; cost of Rs.20,000 if lapse occurs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
CWP No.7214 of 2022 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.7214 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision.06.04.2022
Parshant
...Petitioner
Vs
State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Mr. Ram Pal Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG, Haryana.
-.-
JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL)
2 Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner would be satisfied if the legal notice dated 09.02.2022 (Annexure P-7) served upon respondents No.2 and 3 is considered and decided by said respondents in a time bound manner.
PANKAJ KUMAR 2022.04.06 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
-2-
CWP No.7214 of 2022 (O&M)
sufficient number of copies of the complete paper book be supplied the counsel appearing for the respondents during the course of day.
(JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE April 06, 2022 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2022.04.06 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to issue notice of motion and direct authorities to decide on weapon license application within a time bound manner.
Whether to impose cost for non-compliance by responding authorities.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Parshant
State of Haryana
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
