Dismissed
Randhir Singh v. State of Haryana and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/6314/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed as rendered infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.6314 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.30.05.2022
Randhir Singh
...Petitioner
Vs
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Mr. Jitender Singh, Advocate for Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
-.-
JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and therefore, seeks disposal of the same as such.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(JAISHREE THAKUR)
JUDGE
May 30, 2022 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2022.06.01 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Randhir Singh
State of Haryana
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court